Trikots 2012/2013

Zitat von Oli73:
Wobei bei den Rangers ja nochmal die Besonderheit dazukam, dass Umbro nur eine Art zweiter Sponsor war, da sich die Rangers (analog zu goool.de beim BVB damals) selber ausgestattet haben, oder (war dies zuletzt nicht mehr der Fall)?
Woher hast du das denn? Die Rangers sind eigentlich immer in aktuellen Umbro-Modellen aufgelaufen. Auch bei den vorigen Ausrüstern Diadora und Nike war das so.

Puh, ich finde bei google nicht wirklich die richtige Wortkonstellation um da passende Ergebnisse zu finden.

Ich bin mir aber zu 100% sicher, dass dies der Fall war. Kann auch gut sein, dass ich die Quelle aus dem Thread hier habe. Kann sich niemand anders daran erinnern?

____

Doch was gefunden:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A52083010

Rangers will not change from Umbro to Nike at least until the end of their deal with JJB Sports. Alot of people do not realise this but Rangers deal is not directly with Umbro but with JJB Sports who have appointed Umbro to make all the kits and training gear. This is the same kind of deal Everton have as their deal is with JJB and not Umbro. Rangers sold the right to their kits to JJB for around £18 million I beleive so they get a set figure regardless of how many shirts they sell. This deal is watertight and has nothing to do with the Umbro/Nike tie up. These deals give JJB control over all Everton and Rangers club stores and exclusive rights to sell them and other club items in JJB stores in the UK. The 2005-06 shirt was not produced by Umbro and neither were the 2002-05 Diadora kits made by Diadora. These kits were made by Rangers as a way to earn more money of their kits bu sourcing the material and making the kits themselves to keep more from sales. The Diadora and Umbro logos on these shirts were only added at a cost of £1 million per season to Umbro/Diadora but the kits were not actually produced by them. Rangers did however pay Diadora and Umbro to produce the training and leisurewear ranges for those seasons.
Dieser Beitrag wurde zuletzt von Oli73 am 01.03.2013 um 21:21 Uhr bearbeitet

Zitat von Oli73:
Puh, ich finde bei google nicht wirklich die richtige Wortkonstellation um da passende Ergebnisse zu finden.

Ich bin mir aber zu 100% sicher, dass dies der Fall war. Kann auch gut sein, dass ich die Quelle aus dem Thread hier habe. Kann sich niemand anders daran erinnern?

____

Doch was gefunden:

http://www.bbc.co.uk/dna/606/A52083010

Rangers will not change from Umbro to Nike at least until the end of their deal with JJB Sports. Alot of people do not realise this but Rangers deal is not directly with Umbro but with JJB Sports who have appointed Umbro to make all the kits and training gear. This is the same kind of deal Everton have as their deal is with JJB and not Umbro. Rangers sold the right to their kits to JJB for around £18 million I beleive so they get a set figure regardless of how many shirts they sell. This deal is watertight and has nothing to do with the Umbro/Nike tie up. These deals give JJB control over all Everton and Rangers club stores and exclusive rights to sell them and other club items in JJB stores in the UK. The 2005-06 shirt was not produced by Umbro and neither were the 2002-05 Diadora kits made by Diadora. These kits were made by Rangers as a way to earn more money of their kits bu sourcing the material and making the kits themselves to keep more from sales. The Diadora and Umbro logos on these shirts were only added at a cost of £1 million per season to Umbro/Diadora but the kits were not actually produced by them. Rangers did however pay Diadora and Umbro to produce the training and leisurewear ranges for those seasons.
Gut, das heißt aber nicht, dass die Rangers sich selbst ausgestattet haben. Ausrüster ist tatsächlich Umbro, bloß bekommt (bekam) JJB alle Erlöse aus den Trikotverkäufen. Dafür bekamen die Rangers einen festen Betrag von JJB ausgezahlt.

War also nur ein Deal um schnell an viel Geld zu kommen, langfristig rentiert sich sowas fast nie (sieht man ja nun auch an den Rangers ;) ).

USA heimtrikot 100 th :

http://maillotfoot10.11.over-blog.com/article-new-jersey-usa-100-th-115808583.html

Zitat von Aserbaijan23:

War also nur ein Deal um schnell an viel Geld zu kommen, langfristig rentiert sich sowas fast nie (sieht man ja nun auch an den Rangers ;) ).

The 2005-06 shirt was not produced by Umbro and neither were the 2002-05 Diadora kits made by Diadora. These kits were made by Rangers as a way to earn more money of their kits bu sourcing the material and making the kits themselves to keep more from sales. The Diadora and Umbro logos on these shirts were only added at a cost of £1 million per season to Umbro/Diadora but the kits were not actually produced by them.


Sicher?

Chivas USA away 2013 :

http://maillotfoot10.11.over-blog.com/article-new-away-jersey-2013-chivas-usa-115809155.html

HSV Trikot 2013?

http://www.trikot-shop24.de/blog/2013/03/01/exklusiv-hsv-trikot-2013-2014/

Zitat von Hungary84:
HSV Trikot 2013?

http://www.trikot-shop24.de/blog/2013/03/01/exklusiv-hsv-trikot-2013-2014/
Das ist ne gephotoshopte Variante des letzten Trikots des HSV.

Feyenoord heimtrikot 2013 2014 :

http://maillotfoot10.11.over-blog.com/article-feyenoord-thuisshirt-2013-2014-opel-115895281.html

Zitat von fobsss:
Feyenoord heimtrikot 2013 2014 :

http://maillotfoot10.11.over-blog.com/article-feyenoord-thuisshirt-2013-2014-opel-115895281.html

haha, durch das OPEL-sponsoring sieht's irgendwie total altmodisch aus... wahrscheinlich weil's mich direkt an alte Bayern- oder Milantrikots erinnert. :p